| Measurement of CSR |
|
|
|
The Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) By
Michael
Hopkins
THE MEASUREMENT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) There is much interest and a growing literature on the measurement of what is meant by corporate social responsibility. MHCinternational has used a framework of measurement, first developed in the USA by Prof. Donna Wood, and applied this framework to dozens of companies. The work is described in detail elsewhere - see The Planetary Bargain: CSR Matters (Earthscan, 2003)
Briefly, CSR is measured following a systems model of a business into three levels:
Level I: Principles of Social Responsibility
The level of application of these principles is institutional and is based on a firm's basic obligations as a business organization. Its value is that it defines the institutional relationship between business and society, and specifies what is expected of any business. This level of the CSR model itself is all about the relationship between business and society at large and it has three major elements:
Level II: Processes of Social Responsibility
Corporate social responsiveness is a business's capacity to respond to social pressures. This suggests the ability of a business organisation to survive through adaptation to its business environment. To do so, it must know as much as possible about this business environment, be capable of analyzing its data, and must react to the results of this analysis. But the environment of business is not static; it is a complex and ever changing set of circumstances. This environment can be unchanged for decades, if not centuries, and then it falls apart and is reformed like a kaleidoscope with increasing rapidity. The ability to successfully scan, interpret, and react to the business environment requires equally complex mechanisms.
Three elements are identified as basic elements of this level of the CSR model:
Level III: Outcomes
The main focus of measurement is the third level of the CSR model. To determine if "CSR makes a difference", all of the stakeholders relevant to an issue or complex of issues must be included in any assessment of performance. There are, again, three main categories:
How does MHCi approach bring business benefits?
Applying MHCi’s CSR Model: An Example
An example of the way in which the model might be applied is given for Ben and Jerry's Homemade Ice Cream. Ben and Jerry's founder, Ben Cohen explained one aspect of the ethical principles of the firm.
"Businesses tend to exploit communities and their workers, and that wasn't the way I thought the game should be played. I thought it should be the opposite--that business had a responsibility to give back to the community, that is because the business is allowed to be there in the first place, the business ought to support the community. What we're finding is that when you support the community, the community supports you back."
This is a clear statement of principles which belongs in the first level of the CSRmodel. As stated, the principle fulfills both the institutional element (it acts to legitimise the institution of business) and the discretionary element (it directs the firm in a socially responsible path) and goes well beyond any legal requirements, the element of public responsibility.
At the level of processes of social responsiveness,
corporate social responsiveness is a business’s capacity to respond to social
pressures. Ben and Jerry's social issues scanning is accomplished through
a number of mechanisms ranging from direct community involvement through
newsletters to special events sponsored by the company. The effectiveness
of the scanning and issues management mechanisms can be seen in their funding
of organisations as diverse as the Native American Community Board in South
Dakota to the Central Massachusetts Safe Energy Project. We can see clear
linkages from Ben Cohen’s principles as stated to concrete corporate action.
Among the hundreds of issues which were raised at Ben and Jerry’s, one specific outcome was carried out through its purchasing policies. The firm called on the Greystone Bakery in Yonkers, New York to bake its brownies, a firm that uses its profits to house the homeless and train them as bakers. This outcome is very specific and wholly measurable in a number of ways. One could simply measure the number of homeless people employed by the bakery and the number of trained bakers graduated by the programme. One might also look at how many are still employed at the bakery or in another company as bakers.
There is a clear causal linkage back through corporate mechanisms to ethical principles and the analytical framework can be seen to function. Further research could be done at Ben and Jerry's to cross-relate different elements and their indicators to determine how, for example, profitability is affected by the 7.5% share of pre-tax earnings given by Ben and Jerry's to philanthropic purposes. Conversely, one might take a proposed indicator such as "outcomes of community involvement" and examine its statistical relationships to other indicators in other elements.
The stakeholders in this process are first external to the company and are the homeless who take part in the training programme. A second group of stakeholders can be identified as the community from which the homeless are taken. Clearly, the bakery itself profits as a supplier to Ben and Jerry's and it, in turn, provides benefits to the stakeholders which are possible because of their business with Ben and Jerry's. As one aspect of a very successful social programme, this also benefits shareholders as the success of the firm grows. This is a classic case of new avenues of thinking leading to better profits, reputation, employment as well as a real improvement in the quality of life in the society in which Ben and Jerry’s are operating.
What Indicators do MHCi use?
These are presented in a table too detailed to include here. However, If you would like to examine this in detail you can look at an example in a MHCi table of indicators in table.doc. If you would like to apply a subset of these indicators to your company or institution go to CRITICS (rate your company) on the Web by MHCinternational ltd
Contributed by Michael Hopkins with earlier work by Alton Straughan and comments from Tom Rambaut and Julian Roche all of MHCi.
Every month or so we have a new item of interest to the corporate responsibility world. See previous titles . Michael Hopkins is Professor of Corporate and Social Research at Middlesex University Business School, and Managing Director of the CSR advisory company and think-tank MHC International Ltd. His books include The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Matters (Earthscan,2003) and Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Is Business the Solution? (Earthscan, 2006).
[Copyright © Michael Hopkins and with thanks to earlier work by Alton Straughan and comments from Tom Rambaut and Julian Roche all of MHCi] If you would like to sign-up to receive our Monthly Feature on a regular basisThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Executive Forum
London, Jan 2011 see MHCi csr update 2010
Executive Briefings
Focus on client CSR needs - see Executive Training
Executive Diploma & Summer School
2011 CSR Advanced Certificate Geneva, Switzerland
See also: